Category: Full Text Articles – Audio Posts

Unnamed British officials reportedly “indicated” to The Guardian that a decision had already been made to allow Ukraine to conduct deep strikes in Russia using British Storm Shadow cruise missiles.

Europe’s press sees the US election campaign entering a new phase.

Although it is currently common to talk about the West as a unitary actor in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian War, the stakes actually differ significantly on the two opposite sides of the Atlantic. Most obviously, if Russia succeeds in Ukraine and goes further, Europe will become a battlefield. With this in mind, it makes sense in terms of security strategy to think of Europe individually as well as part of the broader Western world.

Russia’s war against Ukraine has thrown into stark relief what has long been obvious to many international relations scholars, namely that the Cold War ended more than three decades ago but left Europe with a security architecture that has gradually decayed in subsequent years and is now outdated. Mechanisms such as the OSCE and multiple arms treaties are clearly no longer effective. The sole exception here is NATO, but the alliance has been unable to put an end to Russian aggression in Ukraine.

It is therefore misleading to regard the invasion of Ukraine as an isolated problem within the framework of an otherwise stable European security environment. Instead, the current war is at least partially a consequence of the absence of effective alternative mechanisms for maintaining European security. These mechanisms are highly unlikely to emerge if Russia continues to achieve its goals in Ukraine.

Stay updated

As the world watches the Russian invasion of Ukraine unfold, UkraineAlert delivers the best Atlantic Council expert insight and analysis on Ukraine twice a week directly to your inbox.

Some believe that the key to ending the current war lies not in overpowering Russia, but in reinstating just enough mutual trust to put institutional mechanisms back in place. It is worth keeping in mind, however, that multiple attempts over the past decade to turn Russia from a revisionist power into a supporter of the security status quo failed miserably. Although neither Russia nor Europe has any interest whatsoever in going to war with each other over Ukraine, it is also obvious that their security interests do not overlap. It would therefore be unreasonable to end or curb European support for Ukraine at this stage.

The European Union’s current focus on achieving greater strategic autonomy is not just an answer to Russian aggression in Ukraine. Instead, it is best understood as part of a broader trend that is likely to remain one of the driving forces shaping EU thinking for many years to come.

As US hegemony declines, becoming autonomous in the area of defense and managing relations with unreliable autocratic regimes are increasingly important goals for the EU. Such aspirations are bound to run contrary to Russia’s interest in keeping Europe inherently weak and disunited in the face of hard security threats. In other words, if the EU is to achieve strategic autonomy, having a security dilemma with Moscow is unavoidable, regardless of Europe’s approach to the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Broader geopolitical considerations will also shape the future evolution of Europe’s security outlook. These considerations further underline the importance of continued European support for Ukraine.

While the EU is clearly concerned over possible changes in the US security commitment following the country’s presidential election in November, Europe’s own security rhetoric on the key long-term threat posed by China also has the potential to aggravate transatlantic ties. The wording on Beijing in Brussels is often conspicuously different from that of American hawks, with the European Union officially calling China “a partner for cooperation, an economic competitor, and a systemic rival.”

Meanwhile, as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine continues, China is using the war to expand its influence, either as a peace broker or as an aggression enabler. Despite the fact that Russian and Chinese foreign policy approaches may be different, both countries are geared toward undermining the Western-led international order. This kind of collective threat cannot be dealt with by making concessions in Ukraine, nor can it be contained by eclectic and rather soft “partner-competitor-rival” rhetoric.

Silvester Nosenko teaches international relations at the National University of Kyiv Mohyla Academy.

Further reading

The views expressed in UkraineAlert are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Atlantic Council, its staff, or its supporters.

Read more from UkraineAlert

UkraineAlert is a comprehensive online publication that provides regular news and analysis on developments in Ukraine’s politics, economy, civil society, and culture.

The post Why Ukraine will remain central to the future of European security appeared first on Atlantic Council.

When Democratic California congressional candidate Will Rollins boasts of having taken on “the Sinaloa cartel to stop drug trafficking” during his time as a federal prosecutor, it may be instructive to consider the case of one central California drug dealer named Rodney Michael Haskins.

In 2010, Haskins threw a wooden desk at a woman, knocking her to the floor and breaking the desk. He held her by the arms and slammed her body against the floor, then grabbed her hair and did the same to her head, according to court records. The victim was hospitalized, and Haskins was convicted of a domestic violence felony.

Six years later, in August 2016, Haskins was caught selling 130 grams of meth—about 1,000 doses worth—for $1,550 across two deals. He faced two distribution charges, one carrying up to 40 years in prison, the other a life sentence.

By then, Haskins had racked up an epic criminal rap sheet. In addition to the domestic violence felony, his prior convictions included two more drug dealing charges, battery of an officer, disorderly conduct, driving with a suspended license, driving while intoxicated, and failure to appear.

Rollins, then the assistant U.S. attorney assigned to the 2016 meth case, included these details in a court filing that laid out a lenient plea deal he made with Haskins. Rollins dropped the lesser charge—distribution of at least 5 grams of meth—and in exchange, Haskins pleaded guilty to distributing at least 50 grams.

But according to sentencing guidelines, Haskins still faced a potential sentence of life in prison. As Rollins told the court, Haskins was a recidivist meth dealer.

“Clearly, none of defendant’s prior convictions or periods of incarceration deterred him from committing the instant offense, which once again involved methamphetamine,” Rollins wrote. “Defendant committed a serious drug trafficking offense involving a substantial quantity of narcotics, and he is a Career Offender.”

But Rollins still pushed for a lighter sentence—less than 13 years in prison. He told the court that 22 years, the low end of the sentencing guidelines, “may be greater than necessary to deter defendant from committing future crimes or to protect the public given defendant’s age and prior terms of incarceration,” Rollins wrote.

The court agreed with Rollins and let off Haskins, then 51, with an even easier punishment. He was sentenced to the mandatory minimum—10 years in prison, with 5 years of supervised release—and ordered to participate in an outpatient substance abuse program.

Now, Rollins, 39, is running as a Democrat in California’s 41st Congressional District against longtime incumbent Ken Calvert (R.), 71, in a tight rematch. Rollins, considered a top overperformer in 2022, lost by less than 5 percentage points in the last election. This time around, redistricting has swapped in far-left Palm Springs for some of California’s traditionally conservative Inland Empire, making the district a toss-up.

The former assistant U.S. attorney has made public safety a top issue, touting what he claims is his tough-on-crime prosecutorial record. Rollins’s campaign, however, hasn’t provided evidence to support that claim, and an exhaustive Washington Free Beacon review found he repeatedly made lenient plea deals. Several of these generous plea deals involved dealers in methamphetamine, a scourge of central California that has created a public health crisis for the region’s gay community.

Rollins, who’s openly gay and lives in Palm Springs, which is believed to have the country’s largest per capita gay population, says he “served in law enforcement to keep our communities safe from drug traffickers and gangs.” But the Haskins case wasn’t a one-off: Rollins helped a slew of meth dealers secure cushy plea deals, the Free Beacon review of dozens of court records found. They were caught pushing thousands of doses of meth across central California.

Rollins says he wants to strengthen law enforcement task forces to target gang crime. But when a meth-peddling gang member faced life in prison in December 2016, Rollins successfully convinced the court to sentence him to just 10 years.

Rollins’s campaign platform also includes tighter gun control measures, but he dropped firearm charges for two dealers. The Democrat also dropped some charges and offense levels for an illegal immigrant who helped sell two pounds of meth—enough for some 9,000 doses—and a dealer who left his children in his car alone with a customer while he went to collect drugs for the transaction.

The pattern of leniency came as the stakes in the meth trade steadily rose. Mexican cartels are now America’s primary meth manufacturers, importers, and distributors. The drug is increasingly cut with fentanyl—the powerful synthetic opioid driving America’s overdose epidemic that cartels also traffic into the United States. The drug takes a brutal toll on its addicts. Chronic meth use can cause violent behavior and psychotic features such as paranoia, aggression, and hallucinations, according to the Drug Enforcement Administration.

The generous plea deals Rollins struck in the meth cases are only the most recent examples of his persistently soft-on-crime prosecutorial record. The notorious “bleach bandit” David Lohr, for example, faced 60 years in prison after repeatedly dousing groceries in bleach in a two-state poisoning spree, but Rollins helped reduce Lohr’s sentence to just over 4 years, the Free Beacon reported. Part of Lohr’s sentence included mental health treatment for an unspecified period, even though Rollins admitted that Lohr, a schizophrenic, had a history of violence and of abandoning his care plans.

Rollins has also repeatedly touted his record prosecuting Jan. 6 “insurrectionists.” But after exhaustive research, the Free Beacon found only one case tied to Rollins—the curious case of  eyelash store owner Gina Bisignano. Known as the “Beverly Hills insurrectionist,” Bisignano, whose case is still pending, is famous for standing outside the Capitol on January 6 in a Louis Vuitton sweater and Chanel boots, shouting into a megaphone, “You are not going to take away our Trumpy Bear!”

Rollins did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

‘Methamphetamine Capital of the United States’

Meth abuse became an increasing problem nationwide while Rollins was an assistant U.S. attorney. It has also been a decades-long issue for central California, where Rollins served as a prosecutor, and for the gay community, a group that Rollins has sworn to protect.

The number of meth users grew from 1.1 million to 1.7 million—a 55 percent increase—between 2016 and 2019, according to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). That period covered the majority of Rollins’s time as a prosecutor.

The Central District of California, where Rollins worked, called the Riverside and San Bernardino County areas the “methamphetamine capital of the United States” as far back as 2001, and the problem remains critical. In Riverside County in 2022—Rollins’s home the year after he left the Department of Justice—meth was involved in nearly two-thirds of overdose deaths, more than even fentanyl, according to the Riverside University Health System.

Meth also disproportionately harms the gay community. Rollins has promised to “protect all LGBTQ+ Americans,” if elected to Congress, and has attacked Calvert as a bigot.

In July 2023, he told the Washington Blade, the oldest LGBT newspaper in the country, that Calvert has a “pattern of bigoted behavior towards the LGBTQ community.” During his 2022 campaign, Rollins called Calvert homophobic and anti-LGBTQ.

But through his plea deals, Rollins helped the criminals who were pushing meth.

In 2015, the year before Rollins started at the Justice Department, SAMHSA found that meth use was four times more prevalent among gay men than straight men. Only inhalants had a higher disproportionate use. Gay men who use meth, which can cause reckless behavior, are also far more likely to contract HIV, according to a 2020 study, while 2018 research found the drug makes the virus even more harmful.

9,000 Meth Doses, a 100 MPH Getaway—And a Plea Deal

The meth dealers Rollins helped weren’t merely small-time street peddlers. Besides Haskins, three were caught selling—not merely possessing—significant amounts likely far too large for a single user. A fourth was part of a gang and didn’t have paraphernalia like pipes on him, suggesting he was selling and not using, according to police.

Mario Moya Jr. offered Omar Flores a small baggie of meth and cash as payment for helping with a Dec. 2016 drug deal, according to court records. Ultimately, Moya would provide Flores with nearly two pounds of meth, or some 9,000 doses, which he would then sell to a woman at a Cabazon, Calif., gas station for $4,200.

Moya watched the deal go bad from his car. The customer was actually a police source. Squad cars flooded in, and officers began arresting Flores. Moya punched the gas and led police on a 100 MPH chase. He successfully evaded law enforcement but was later arrested at his home.

Moya and Flores, who illegally entered the United States in 2004, were each indicted on charges related to distribution of at least 500 grams of meth and faced potential life sentences. Moya, already a felon, was also facing a gun charge, which carried a maximum sentence of 10 years. The police source also told investigators about having seen Moya involved in a 6-pound and a 8-to-10-pound meth deal.

But Rollins helped the pair score plea deals. He dropped the conspiracy count against Flores and reduced the distribution charge, though Flores still faced up to 20 years in prison, a lifetime of supervised release, and a $1 million fine.

The U.S. Probation Office recommended a seven-year sentence. Rollins noted Flores’s illegal border crossing and prior misdemeanor convictions but suggested dropping Flores’s sentence to less than six years with three years of probation. He pointed to Flores’s steady employment as an electrician and meth addiction to justify the reduced sentence. In October 2017, Flores was sentenced to four years in prison and drug rehab.

Moya was sentenced to 10 years in prison, with 5 years’ probation, after pleading guilty to the distribution charges. He was also ordered to participate in an outpatient substance abuse program upon release.

Gang Tattoos and a Dropped Gun Charge

Rollins is pushing for tighter gun control measures, such as background checks for purchasers with violent histories and red-flag laws, and he wants police to prioritize fighting gang crime. But when Justin Robert Burkett, a known gang member, was caught with meth and a stolen firearm in December 2016, Rollins helped him score a sweetheart deal.

Burkett was speeding in a stolen Chrysler on a suspended license when a California Highway Police officer stopped him, court documents show. The police searched the car and found more than 120 grams of meth and a loaded .38 caliber revolver hidden under the floor.

Burkett was indicted on one count of possession and intent to distribute meth and one count of possessing a firearm in the furtherance of a drug crime. He was looking at a life sentence for the drug charge and at least five years for the gun crime.

In exchange for a guilty plea, Rollins dropped the firearm charge. He did so while noting a series of Burkett’s prior arrests in a sentencing memorandum: endangering a child, assault or battery on school property, threatening a crime with the intent to terrorize, a hit-and-run, and possessing a loaded firearm while in possession of methamphetamine.

Rollins also cited another arrest: participating in a street gang. In fact, Burkett sports tattoos for the Westside VLP gang, to which police said he belonged, according to court documents. And when law enforcement went to search his residence, another Westside VLP member came out wielding a machete, dropping it when he saw the intruders were police officers.

Still, because Burkett had no prior convictions, Rollins recommended just 10 years in prison, the mandatory minimum. The court agreed.

A Family Affair Meth Deal

Juan Carlos Garcia bragged about the purity of his meth while setting up a 2012 meeting with a customer—apparently a confidential police source. Garcia, with his kids in the backseat, parked his car at a laundromat. The phony customer entered the car and gave him nearly $3,500. Garcia left the vehicle to retrieve 80 grams of meth from the supplier’s car two spaces away.

Garcia pleaded guilty to the lesser of two charges—possession with intent to distribute at least five grams of meth—and faced up to 40 years in prison. Rollins dropped the second charge, distribution of at least 50 grams of meth, which would have carried a life prison sentence.

Rollins pointed out that Garcia had had his probation revoked after he failed to complete a domestic batterers program, ordered after he was convicted of a domestic battery charge. But the prosecutor said at least some of Garcia’s criminal history could be blamed on his “childhood in the midst of the violence of El Salvador’s civil war.”

Rollins recommended that Garcia serve seven years in prison and four years’ probation, though the defendant was ultimately sentenced to five years in prison, the mandatory minimum.

The post Democrat Will Rollins Has Long History of Going Easy on Meth Dealers—Including a Violent Gang Member—But He’s Running for Congress as a Tough-on-Crime Prosecutor appeared first on .

The Biden-Harris State Department’s top DEI officials pull in nearly $200,000 annually in taxpayer-funded salaries, according to financial disclosures, putting them among the highest-paid American diplomats.

Constance Mayer, who served as the acting chief Diversity and Inclusion officer until April of this year, raked in $194,510 annually, according to financial disclosures published by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM). The State Department’s Special Representative for Racial Justice and Equity, Desiree Cormier Smith, makes $191,900 each year, the disclosures show.

The officials draw far more than the average State Department employee, who makes around $100,000 or less, depending on post and tenure. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, the country’s top diplomat, only makes slightly more, pulling in around $221,000 annually, though he is reportedly sitting on a “$10 million fortune” driven by his past work as a corporate consultant.

The financial disclosures provide a window into the Biden-Harris administration’s push to emphasize what critics label “woke” priorities in the federal government. The State Department is leading these efforts internationally, reportedly pumping more than $80 million into a litany of programs meant to advance “racial equity” and prevent “gender and sexuality discrimination” abroad. Blinken formed the department’s Office of Diversity and Inclusion in February 2021, shortly after a White House order instructed the entire federal government to ramp up DEI initiatives.

He also created the racial equity envoy position, which maintains a staff and office. Cormier Smith was appointed to the role in 2022 after working as a senior policy advisor for liberal billionaire George Soros’s Open Society Foundations. Financial disclosures indicate her spouse pulls in more than $230,000 annually at Freddie Mac, the federal mortgage company.

Mayer, meanwhile, served as the State Department’s top DEI official until April and helped establish the new equity office. She was replaced by Zakiya Carr Johnson, who entered the job as “a social inclusion, diversity, and equity expert and strategist with over 20 years of experience.” OPM does not yet list Johnson’s salary information publicly, but a source familiar with the department’s pay structure estimated that she earns “close to $200k” per year.

Before taking the job, Johnson decried traditional American systems, saying in an online discussion that they are “deeply rooted in patriarchy, in colonialism, in atheism.” A “culture of misogyny,” she said, “has allowed men to act without consequence.”

The State Department’s internal diversity push, primarily crafted by its DEI office, has drawn scrutiny for requiring that employees “pass a loyalty test in diversity, equity, and inclusion” if they are to be “considered for promotions and higher pay,” Fox News reported in May. American diplomats must now “demonstrate through documentation that they are actively involved in DEI practices.”

Gina Abercrombie-Winstanley, the State Department’s inaugural DEI officer who served in the job until June 2023, confirmed the new practices during a speech last year.

“We made the change that if you wanted to be considered for promotion at the Department of State, you must be able to document what you are doing to support diversity, equity, and inclusion, and accessibility,” Abercrombie-Winstanley said. “This is how you are judged for promotion.”

Blinken has also taken a lead role in pushing DEI policies, telling staffers in an internal memo earlier this year that they should be wary about “misgendering” their colleagues and avoid using terms like “mother/father,” “son/daughter,” and “husband/wife.” The goal, Blinken said, is to “increase understanding of gender identity and provide guidance on gender identity language and best practices that support an inclusive work environment.”

The memo also urged employees to include their pronouns in official communications, a policy that backfired last year when the State Department’s internal email system assigned staffers random, and often incorrect, pronouns.

The “pronoun glitch,” as the State Department described it in emails viewed by the Washington Free Beacon, “unfortunately” assigned many employees the incorrect gender pronouns. The State Department subsequently offered free therapy to any employee who felt “hurt or upset” over the situation.

Conservative critics say the State Department’s DEI push has negatively impacted recruitment, efficiency, and morale. The Heritage Foundation concluded in a May report that the diversity requirements “undermine U.S. diplomacy and betray American values,” chiefly by placing an emphasis on race and ideology over foreign policy expertise.

“Ideologically driven bureaucrats at the State Department are severely undermining U.S. diplomacy by artificially engineering equal outcomes in hiring and personnel decisions, through overriding objective criteria,” according to former foreign service officer Hank Simonson, the report’s author. “The world is on fire right now—as seen by the conflicts in Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan. Yet, the State Department is wasting limited resources on an agenda that does not advance American interests and is not supported by data.”

Externally, the State Department’s diversity push has brought a host of “woke” programs to countries across the globe. This has included taxpayer-funded drag shows in Ecuador, a host of “LGBT” initiatives, and as well as “diversity and inclusion” exchange programs.

The State Department has also poured taxpayer funds into an “LGBT activist group supporting prostitution in Colombia,” as well as “a film festival featuring incest and pedophilia in Portugal,” according to a Senate investigation.

The post Top DEI Officials at Biden-Harris State Department Rake In Nearly $200k a Year, Records Show appeared first on .

Columbia University is distancing itself from a new faculty group that hosted an anti-Israel doctor who has praised terrorists, including a Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) cofounder who helped plan an Israeli airplane hijacking and a Hamas leader suspected of masterminding a rabbi’s murder.

The doctor, British-Palestinian surgeon and University of Glasgow rector Ghassan Abu-Sittah, spoke Tuesday evening at Columbia University Health Sciences for Palestine’s (CUHSP) inaugural event “Gaza: Public Health in Crisis.” The group is composed of Columbia University Irving Medical Center faculty and staff working to “bring attention to health justice in Palestine.”

CUHSP’s advertisement for the online panel included Columbia’s logo and noted that it was cosponsored by “SPIRIT Initiative and the Certificate Program in Global Health, Mailman School of Public Health, [and] Columbia University Medical Center.”

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by CUMC for Palestine (@cumc4palestine)

A Columbia spokeswoman, however, denied that the anti-Israel group was affiliated with the university.

“Columbia University Health Sciences for Palestine is not a recognized Columbia group and is not authorized to hold an event using University resources,” she told the Washington Free Beacon. “The group has been reminded of this and told to remove any Columbia logos from their materials.”

She added that the certificate program has since removed its affiliation and that the flyer has been updated. But CUHSP’s original advertisement was still active on social media as of Wednesday evening.

The spokeswoman didn’t respond when asked if CUHSP’s members or the initial cosponsors would face consequences.

Regardless, CUHSP proceeded with its event.

During the online panel, which more than 200 people attended, Abu-Sittah accused Israel of intentionally creating a famine in Gaza. He called the Jewish state the “tip of the genocidal iceberg” and said the United States, Britain, and Germany were part of the “genocidal project” for supplying Israel with arms, intelligence, and “boots on the ground.” None of those nations have deployed troops to Gaza.

Abu-Sittah, who volunteered in Gaza hospitals, said “Israel was unable to provide a shred of evidence” that Hamas leaders operated in tunnels underneath hospitals. But U.S. and Israeli intelligence dispute that claim. Intelligence also shows that the terror group used Al-Shifa Hospital for cover, weapons storage, and hostage detention and destroyed electronics and documents while evacuating.

Abu-Sittah has long sided with anti-Israel terrorists. He attended the 2019 funeral of Maher Al-Yamani, a PFLP cofounder who helped plan the 1968 hijacking of an El Al plane, which resulted in a dozen Israeli passengers being taken hostage for 40 days. Al-Yamani was sentenced to 31 years for his role, though he was released early as part of a separate hostage exchange. Abu-Sittah’s lawyers described the doctor and Al-Yamani as friends, according to the Jewish Chronicle.

At the funeral, Abu-Sittah was pictured sitting next to Leila Khaled, a PFLP member who was involved in two other plane hijackings. A year later, he spoke at a ceremony in Beirut commemorating the first anniversary of Al-Yamani’s death. Abu-Sittah wept alongside mourners and hailed Al-Yamani’s legacy, video shows.

“He still scares the enemy. All of Maher’s efforts, since he opened his eyes to the world and he became a young man, didn’t go to waste,” Abu-Sittah said at the ceremony. “And this is our only comfort: that even when Maher leaves, the Israelis will still be afraid of Maher.”

In 2018, Abu-Sittah praised Ahmad Jarrar, a Hamas leader accused of plotting the drive-by murder of Raziel Shevack, an Israeli rabbi and father of six. Israel Defense Forces killed Jarrar in a shootout nearly a month later following a manhunt for his capture.

“The martyrdom of the resistance member Ahmed Nasr Jarrar … represents a pivotal moment,” Abu-Sittah wrote, according to the Jewish Chronicle. “The Palestinian people stand watching one of their dearest and best sons drenched in their pure blood.”

He also called Jarrar a “hero” and described the partnership between Israeli and Palestinian security services as a “satanic alliance.”

His comments echoed Hamas’s statement eulogizing Jarrar.

“Our hero and martyr has carried out the duty of resistance and defending the land of Palestine,” the statement said. “The West Bank will produce 1,000 Jarrars.”

Abu-Sittah defended using “emotive language,” though his attorneys told the Jewish Chronicle that the doctor was unaware Jarrar had been involved in Shevack’s killing.

More recently, Abu-Sittah claimed Israel has “intensionally [sic] targeted children in its genocidal war” following Hamas’s Oct. 7 terror attack.

He was also barred from entering Germany earlier this year. In April, the doctor was scheduled to attend an anti-Israel conference in Berlin, but airport police in Germany denied him entry into the country for “the safety of the people at the conference and public order,” Abu-Sittah told the Associated Press. The conference was canceled later that day after its livestream showed someone barred from political activity in Germany, though Berlin police wouldn’t say who.

The surgeon was originally banned from the country for only a few days. But when he landed in France on the way to London, French authorities told him Germany had put a year-long ban on his visa. That meant he was barred from entering any of Europe’s nearly 30 Schengen Area nations.

Abu-Sittah did not respond to a request for comment.

Three other panelists joined Abu-Sittah on Tuesday: Sarah Aly, Jess Ghannam, and Jeffrey Sachs. Salman S. Khan and Noga Shalev, both assistant professors of medicine at the Columbia University Medical Center, moderated the event. Columbia’s Faculty and Staff for Justice in Palestine and Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD) advertised the event on social media.

CUAD was among the groups that contributed to the chaotic start of Columbia’s fall semester. On September 3, the first day of classes, CUAD and the university’s Students for Justice in Palestine chapter prevented students from entering campus. CUAD in a Telegram post also praised Hamas leaders and promised that protests would continue.

The next day, CUAD promoted Columbia School of International and Public Affairs Palestine Working Group’s protest of a course taught by former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Agitators dubbed it a “sham class,” accused Clinton of “war crimes,” and called on students to walk out. A flyer advertising the event showed a bloody image of the former secretary of state with her eyes crossed out.

Columbia’s Faculty and Staff for Justice in Palestine, meanwhile, has long supported anti-Israel activism on campus, including amnesty for anti-Semitic students and divestment from Israel. After student protesters were arrested in April for storming a campus building, the faculty group went on strike, demanding the removal of police from the campus.

The post Columbia Distances Itself From New Faculty Group That Hosted Pro-Terrorist Surgeon appeared first on .

(NewsNation) — Social Security reform has long been seen as a political minefield, but a new poll shows Americans on both sides of the aisle agree on several potential fixes.

Congress has roughly a decade to shore up the program, which is facing a financial shortfall. Otherwise, millions of people will see their Social Security benefits slashed.

A new survey by the University of Maryland’s Program for Public Consultation (PPC) shows that most Americans agree on some proposals to increase revenues and cut costs.

Across six swing states, 86% to 89% of respondents support subjecting all wages over $400,000 to the payroll tax, the poll found. That change would eliminate 60% of the shortfall, the report said.

Nationally, 87% were in favor of the idea, including 86% of Republicans and 89% of Democrats. Today, the payroll tax only applies to wages up to $168,600.

A majority of Republicans (87%) and Democrats (87%) surveyed also supported gradually raising the payroll tax rate from the current level of 6.2% to 6.5% by 2030.

The payroll tax is Social Security’s primary source of income, but due to an aging workforce, higher life expectancy and low birth rates, current collections won’t be enough to pay out full benefits in the future.

The findings imply most voters support congressional Democrats’ recent efforts to impose payroll taxes on higher incomes.

Meanwhile, Republicans have been less forthright about their Social Security plan, but the survey suggests two benefit reductions may be politically palatable.

Nationally, most Republicans (92%) and Democrats (93%) supported reducing benefits for the top 20% of income earners.

Respondents were also given the option of gradually raising the retirement age, which is currently 67. The poll found that 89% of respondents supported raising the retirement age to 68 by 2033.

Steven Kull, who heads the PPC at the University of Maryland, said the poll shows Americans on both sides of the aisle are measured and thoughtful when given the full Social Security picture.

“There’s a kind of convergence around spreading the pain in different ways,” he said.

It also suggests Social Security reform is less politically fraught than many politicians and members of the media have made it out to be.

“What this tells us is that political leaders have the option of pursuing this,” Kull said. “If they explain this to the public, the public will get on board.”

Unlike a traditional poll, respondents went through an interactive “policymaking simulation” where they were presented with the pros and cons of each potential reform. Each choice included gradations that allowed respondents to show their level of support.

You can go through the same interactive simulation here.

The survey was fielded Aug. 2-17, 2024 with 4,677 adults and included approximately 600 people each in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, as well as, 1,224 nationally.

A consultant whose companies were paid almost $10 million by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s presidential campaign and associated political action committee appeared to be part of the mob that moved into restricted areas of the U.S. Capitol grounds on January 6, 2021.

The consultancy firm, operated by Trent Pool and his brother, worked to get Kennedy on the ballot in several states.

In photos and videos from January 6, a man resembling Pool can be repeatedly seen wearing a knit beanie from Pool’s alma mater, Southern Methodist University. In one video, he responds to the name “Trent.”

The man in the SMU hat spent hours on what the FBI later called restricted ground during the melee and was involved in carrying a barricade away from a police line after others had seized it. The man can be seen asking another demonstrator to take a photo of him, telling an associate to join him near a standoff with police, and waving a “Don’t Tread on Me” flag.

The man spent hours on what the FBI later called restricted ground and was involved in carrying a barricade away from a police line after others had seized it.

“My client was in Washington, D.C., with a documentary film crew to record portions of the rally that day,” said Pool’s lawyer, Jacques Catafago, in response to an inquiry from The Intercept.

“My client condemns the actions of the January 6 rioters, and any insinuation that he participated in that violence would be false and defamatory,” Catafago said. “In fact, while rioters were storming the Capitol, my client was outside helping a disabled friend get to safety and helping protect a police officer who was being attacked.”

Catafago did not respond to specific questions about the photos and videos of the man waving a flag and holding a police barricade aloft, but made a general statement that Pool disputed the accuracy of the materials reviewed by The Intercept. There is no evidence Pool entered the Capitol building, and he has not been charged with any crimes related to the January 6 riots.

When Kennedy was still actively campaigning for the presidency — a 10-month effort to get on all 50 ballots — Kennedy’s campaign and an affiliated super PAC paid companies associated with Pool’s firm $9,367,343, according to federal filings.

Though Kennedy suspended his campaign, Pool’s effort may still be felt in the presidential race. Kennedy has sued to be removed from ballots in order to benefit Donald Trump, including critical Midwestern swing states.

The man wearing the SMU beanie in the January 6 photos and videos reviewed by The Intercept can be seen in restricted areas right outside the Capitol building, around the southwest staircase and the western terrace.

One photograph of the man in the SMU beanie was posted on a far-right blog in January 2021. A former Kennedy campaign staffer and two of Pool’s former political associates, all of whom requested anonymity to for employment reasons, said the man in the beanie was Pool.

In the videos and photographs, the man with the SMU beanie can also be seen observing as rioters scaled scaffolds and fought their way into entrance tunnels to the Capitol.

Pool is among a group of Kennedy campaign consultants and staffers who have ties to right-wing figures. Zach Henry, a social media influencer hired in March by Kennedy, appeared to be on restricted Capitol grounds on January 6, according to NBC News.

With sometime Trump supporters in his orbit, Kennedy struck a deal to drop out of the race and throw his weight to the former Republican president. In exchange, Kennedy would, as the Trump campaign put it, be part of a transition team “to help pick the people who will be running the government.”

“We Got Trent”

In a video viewed by The Intercept, the man with the SMU beanie who resembled Pool can be seen on the southwest staircase heading to the upper west terrace of the Capitol waving a “Don’t Tread on Me” Gadsden flag.

A person holding the camera calls to him: “We got Trent.” The man in the SMU beanie then waves back. A third man, who is also in the frame and whose relationship to Pool, if any, is unknown, says, “We are taking the Capitol back!”

Like other photos and videos, the flag-waving takes place on what authorities have said in court was restricted ground. Much of the Capitol grounds were closed on January 6 in preparation for the upcoming inauguration, with officers, barriers, and signage around the perimeter. The initial police cordon was quickly broken when Trump supporters arrived.

In a series of photographs taken just before 3 p.m., the man in the SMU beanie is visible at the back of a crowd. At the front of the group, rioters were attempting to break through the police lines guarding the Capitol’s upper terrace.

The rioters seized a bike rack barricade being used by Metropolitan Police Department officers. After others passed the barricade back, the man in the SMU hat, along with another man, is seen in the photographs carrying a bike rack toward the staircase wall. In a subsequent photo, the barrier is gone and the men are seen peering over the edge of the staircase wall.

A live-feed video posted online shows the man in the SMU beanie standing at the back of the crowd that removed and passed a barricade back; the video ends approximately two minutes before a barricade is handed to the area where the man in the SMU beanie is standing.

In the photo posted on the far-right blog, the man in the SMU beanie is leaning against a concrete wall. A separate video shows him standing at the same spot, against a wall adjacent to one of the Capitol entrance tunnels that saw some of the day’s worst violence.

The man in the SMU hat can be seen in other publicly available archived videos of that day. In security footage, around a 4:45 p.m. timestamp, more than two hours after first being captured on the Capitol grounds, he passes a group of police in riot gear and appears to interact with the officers.

Kennedy January 6 Skepticism

Several Kennedy staffers have expressed skepticism that the attack on the Capitol on January 6 was violent or an attempt to overturn the election.

Kennedy himself has equivocated on the riots, questioning whether the January 6 prosecutions were politically motivated.

In a fundraising email, the Kennedy campaign referred to January 6 rioters as “activists” who were “stripped of their constitutional liberties,” but later said the email came from a contractor who the campaign cut ties with.

Last week, in an interview on the Tucker Carlson Live Show Tour, Kennedy downplayed the January 6 riot. “If you broke the law you should be punished, but was the republic threatened on January 6?” he said. “Even if a building was burned down, it’s not the end of the republic.” (Kennedy’s campaign did not respond to a request for comment.)

Pool’s two ballot access companies earned a combined $9,367,343 from Kennedy’s campaign and affiliated super PAC American Values 2024 between November 2023 and July 2024. He runs those two ballot access firms, Accelevate 2020 and Public Appeal LLC, with his brother Trey Pool.

Trent Pool, who was recently arrested for violating a restraining order in connection with an alleged April assault of a woman in New York City, is the grandson of former Democratic Texas Rep. Joe Richard Pool. His father is a Texas district judge who raised eyebrows by running as a Democrat in 2022 after years of being a Libertarian-leaning Republican.

Pool has said he started doing work for third parties and candidates in 2010, going on to do petition collecting and ballot work for Rand Paul, Tulsi Gabbard, and Brock Pierce, among others. Pool’s company Accelevate 2020 was also paid $212,098 by Nikki Haley’s campaign in 2024, among other clients.

Kennedy is seeking to remove his name from ballots in 10 swing states to help Trump but will remain on the ballot in several states, including Wisconsin, where the deadline for removing his name has passed, and Michigan, where a judge recently ruled Kennedy should stay on the ballot.

The post RFK Campaign Paid $10 Million to Consultant Who Appears to Have Been on Capitol Grounds During Jan. 6 Attack appeared first on The Intercept.

Adobe addressed tens of vulnerabilities, including critical issues that could allow attackers to execute arbitrary code on Windows and macOS.

Adobe Patch Tuesday security updates addressed multiple vulnerabilities in its products, including critical flaws that could allow attackers to execute arbitrary code on Windows and macOS systems.

The most severe vulnerabilities are two critical memory corruption flaws in Acrobat and PDF Reader, tracked as CVE-2024-41869 (CVSS score of 7.8) and CVE-2024-45112 (CVSS score of 8.6).

The vulnerability CVE-2024-41869 is a Use After Free issue while the flaw CVE-2024-45112 is a Type Confusion’ bug. An attacker can exploit these vulnerabilities for arbitrary code execution.

Vulnerability Category	Vulnerability Impact	Severity	CVSS base score	CVSS vector	CVE Number
Use After Free (CWE-416)	Arbitrary code execution	Critical	7.8	CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H	CVE-2024-41869
Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type (‘Type Confusion’) (CWE-843)	Arbitrary code execution	Critical	8.6	CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H	CVE-2024-45112

CVE-2024-45112 was reported by an anonymous researcher and the researcher Haifei Li of EXPMON and Check Point Research reported the flaw CVE-2024-41869.

The company also fixed the following critical flaws in Photoshop

Vulnerability Category	Vulnerability Impact	Severity	CVSS base score	CVSS vector	CVE Number
Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122)	Arbitrary code execution	Critical	7.8	CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H	CVE-2024-43756
Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787)	Arbitrary code execution	Critical	7.8	CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H	CVE-2024-43760
Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787)	Arbitrary code execution	Critical	7.8	CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H	CVE-2024-45108
Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787)	Arbitrary code execution	Critical	7.8	CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H	CVE-2024-45109
Out-of-bounds Read (CWE-125)	Memory leak	Important	5.5	CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N	CVE-2024-45110

and in the Illustrator software

Vulnerability Category	Vulnerability Impact	Severity	CVSS base score	CVSS vector	CVE Numbers
Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound) (CWE-191)	Arbitrary code execution	Critical	7.8	CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H	CVE-2024-41857
Integer Overflow or Wraparound (CWE-190)	Arbitrary code execution	Critical	7.8	CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H	CVE-2024-34121
Improper Input Validation (CWE-20)	Arbitrary code execution	Critical	7.8	CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H	CVE-2024-41856
Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787)	Arbitrary code execution	Critical	7.8	CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H	CVE-2024-45114
Use After Free (CWE-416)	Arbitrary code execution	Critical	7.8	CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H	CVE-2024-43758
Out-of-bounds Read (CWE-125)	Memory leak	Important	5.5	CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N	CVE-2024-45111
NULL Pointer Dereference (CWE-476)	Application denial-of-service	Moderate	3.3	CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L	CVE-2024-43759

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, Adobe)

The Los Angeles Times published a sprawling essay Wednesday written by environmental reporter Rosanna Xia, who expressed overwhelming grief about the prospect of climate change and called to “fix individualism” and “reimagine” society’s “systems” to address climate change.

“How do you cope? I feel the sorrow, the quiet plea for guidance every time someone asks me this question. As an environmental reporter dedicated to helping people make sense of climate change, I know I should have answers,” Xia lamented in her essay. “But the truth is, it took me until now to face my own grief.”

Two paragraphs later, Xia said that she finds herself “questioning whether I could ever justify bringing my own children into this world,” adding that she “can’t help but feel like we’re just counting down the days to our own extinction” and noting the amount of plastic used nationwide and decreasing populations of certain butterfly species.

Xia’s essay underscores how energy and environmental reporters, purportedly tasked with objectively reporting stories related to their beat, often have the same views as far-left climate activists. Such despair about climate, for example, is a hallmark of groups that have called on the federal government to declare a “climate emergency” and disrupt public events nationwide to protest fossil fuels.

Later in her story, Xia calls for fixing “individualism” and reimagining “the systems that got us into such a devastating crisis in the first place” in order to save the planet.

“It is not too late to turn your climate anxiety into climate empathy,” she wrote. “Acknowledging the emotional toll on people beyond yourself can be an opportunity to listen and support one another. Embracing our feelings—and then finding others who also want to turn their fear into action—can be the missing spark to much-needed social and environmental healing.”

In a coinciding article also published Wednesday, Xia listed book recommendations for people with climate anxiety who need hope. “The future of our planet has become all but impossible to ignore, and it’s not exactly easy digging your way out of a despair that is so deeply connected to, well, everything,” she said.

The worldview presented by Xia, according to Alliance for Consumers executive director O.H. Skinner, leads directly to policies that make everyday items, such as residential appliances and cars, more expensive. Activists have increasingly targeted those items in their regulatory war on carbon emissions, even as the price of goods across the board have skyrocketed in recent years.

“This is the ultimate worldview that motivates so much of the war on household appliances and everyday conveniences: these activists don’t care that life is being made harder, because they ultimately care about ideology over their own children, future children, or even their own lives,” Skinner told the Washington Free Beacon. “It’s sad, and not a path most consumers want to follow.”

But Xia and other journalists at both the Times and other mainstream outlets that have published “climate anxiety” pieces are often rewarded by organizations that oversee journalism awards.

For example, Xia was awarded a prize last year for her reporting on the environment by the Society of Environmental Journalists, an organization that presents itself as nonpartisan but routinely targets the oil industry and recommends that reporters reach out to activist groups such as the Union of Concerned Scientists when writing stories.

And other Times reporters have been awarded prizes by Covering Climate Now, a group that also presents itself as nonpartisan but was cofounded by left-wing news outlet The Nation. The group is housed at the Washington, D.C.-based Fund for Constitutional Government, which boasts funding from top liberal nonprofits such as the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, and MacArthur Foundation, according to tax filings reviewed by the Free Beacon.

The post LA Times Reporter Reveals ‘Climate Anxiety’ and Calls To ‘Fix Individualism’ To Save the Planet appeared first on .