The News And Times Review - NewsAndTimes.org | Links | Blog | Tweets  | Selected Articles 

Categories
Full Text Articles - Audio Posts

Nonprofit Killer Provision Quietly Disappears from Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill”

Spread the news

An effort to empower President Trump to target his ideological enemies in the nonprofit sector stalled when Trump’s sprawling, agenda-setting megabill faced opposition from far-right Republicans in the House.

Now, with an amended version of the longer bill inching toward approval, the push to target nonprofits appeared to suffer a major setback.

“For now it’s not in the text of the bill, and that’s an improvement from where we were at last week.”

The latest draft of the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” which passed the House Budget Committee on Sunday night, no longer includes a provision that critics have dubbed the “nonprofit killer.”

The measure, which has surfaced in several different forms over the past two years, would grant the secretary of the Treasury Department broad powers to strip nonprofits’ tax-exempt status by labeling them as a “terrorist supporting organization” — with little in the way of due process or evidentiary standards.

It was not immediately clear why the provision was absent from the latest draft of the bill, but a Democratic congressional aide said the removal was indeed a deliberate move by the GOP.

“Apparently Republican staffers removed it after hearing about it from stakeholders and working with leadership on a solution, but I’m not sure what the solution is,” the source told The Intercept.

The removal of the clause prompted cautious optimism from civil-society advocates, according to Kia Hamadanchy, senior policy counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union.

“It’s possible they took it out to rewrite it in some way, because we know that this package is going to be amended,” Hamadanchy told The Intercept. “But for now it’s not in the text of the bill, and that’s an improvement from where we were at last week.”

Fits and Starts

The latest push to get the nonprofit-killer clause into law appeared on page 380 of a 389-page bundle of amendments put forward by the GOP-controlled House Ways and Means Committee last week and passed out of committee intact.

After far-right Republicans opposed to government spending stalled the megabill, the section on nonprofits appears to have been removed from an updated version put out Monday by the House Committee on Rules.

Proponents of the provision have been trying for well over a year to make it law, an effort that critics have described as an assault on free speech aimed in particular at pro-Palestine groups. First introduced in late 2023, an initial version of the bill passed the House with overwhelming support from Democrats and Republicans alike.

In the wake of Trump’s reelection victory, however, and in the face of a concerted campaign by the ACLU and other civil-society groups, many Democrats changed their tune.

When the last version of the bill, H.R. 9495, was introduced in November, Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, marshaled opposition to the measure and even managed to vote it down in one floor vote.

The Republican-controlled House, however, pressed on and the bill eventually passed with near-unanimous GOP support — and with the help of a handful of Democrats — but ultimately stalled in the Senate without becoming law.

The Big Beautiful Bill passed a major hurdle over the weekend after an initial attempt by four hardline conservatives to block the package.

Opponents of the nonprofit killer clause are not counting it out just yet, Hamadanchy said.

“We are continuing to track things,” he said, “in case this thing comes back from the dead as it has numerous times.”

The post Nonprofit Killer Provision Quietly Disappears from Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill” appeared first on The Intercept.


Spread the news
Categories
Full Text Articles - Audio Posts

CBS News CEO Resigns Amid Internal Unrest, Anti-Semitism Accusations, and Trump’s $20 Billion Lawsuit

Spread the news

CBS News CEO Wendy McMahon announced Monday that she is resigning, the latest blow to the embattled network as it grapples with internal unrest, accusations of anti-Israel bias in its coverage, and a $20 billion lawsuit from President Donald Trump.

“It’s become clear that the company and I do not agree on the path forward,” McMahon wrote in a memo to staffers. “It’s time for me to move on and for this organization to move forward with new leadership.”

McMahon’s resignation comes during a tumultuous period for CBS.

The network entered talks last month to settle Trump’s $20 billion lawsuit, which accuses 60 Minutes of deceptively editing a 2024 interview with then-presidential candidate Kamala Harris to boost her campaign. An unedited transcript of the interview has confirmed that several of Harris’s lengthy, rambling responses—particularly on Israel—were heavily condensed. The show’s longtime executive producer, Bill Owens, abruptly resigned last month, criticizing CBS’s parent company, Paramount.

Meanwhile, CBS controlling shareholder Shari Redstone has voiced her dissatisfaction with the network’s anti-Israel coverage. CBS faced scrutiny in particular for a January 60 Minutes segment that criticized Israel’s war against Hamas terrorists and relied on sources affiliated with the Council on American-Islamic Relations, whose executive director has openly praised Hamas.

CBS also faced backlash last fall after McMahon and then-editorial chief Adrienne Roark reprimanded anchor Tony Dokoupil for challenging guest Ta-Nehisi Coates’s criticisms of Israel. Redstone defended Dokoupil, calling McMahon and Roark’s reprimand a “bad mistake” and praising the anchor for modeling “what civil discourse is.”

Redstone supported McMahon’s ouster, a source told the New York Post.

The post CBS News CEO Resigns Amid Internal Unrest, Anti-Semitism Accusations, and Trump’s $20 Billion Lawsuit appeared first on .


Spread the news
Categories
Full Text Articles - Audio Posts

J.D. Vance Questions Whether Biden Was ‘Capable of Doing the Job’ Following Cancer Diagnosis

Spread the news

Joe Biden Delivers His First Speech As A Former President In Joint Base Andrews Sendoff Ceremony

Vice President J.D. Vance questioned on Monday whether former President Joe Biden was “capable of doing the job” of Commander in Chief, following the news that Biden has an aggressive form of prostate cancer.

“Of course, we wish the best for the former President’s health. It sounds pretty serious, but hopefully he makes the right recovery,” Vance told reporters. “I will say, whether the right time to have this conversation is now or at some point in the future, we really do need to be honest about whether the former President was capable of doing the job.”

[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]

“I don’t think he was able to do a good job for the American people,” Vance continued.

Biden’s office announced on Sunday that he had been diagnosed with cancer on Friday, after doctors found a nodule on his prostate. After additional tests, doctors determined that the cancer had spread to his bones. Biden’s Gleason score, which is used to grade the aggressiveness of prostate cancers, was 9, indicating that his cancer is among the most aggressive.

His office said that the cancer “appears to be hormone-sensitive, which allows for effective management,” and that Biden and his family “are reviewing treatment options with his physicians.”

Read More: What Does a Gleason Score of 9 Mean? Understanding Biden’s Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

Speaking to reporters on Air Force Two on Monday, Vance said he wished the former President well, but added that he didn’t believe Biden was in “good enough health” to lead the country. Vance said he blamed Biden “less” than the people around him.

“Why didn’t the American people have a better sense of his health picture? Why didn’t the American people have more accurate information about what he was actually dealing with?” Vance said. “This is the guy who carries around the nuclear football for the world’s largest nuclear arsenal. This is not child’s play, and we can pray for good health, but also recognize that if you’re not in good enough health to do the job, you shouldn’t be doing the job.”

Biden’s physician declared in a medical record summary released by the White House in February 2024 that Biden was “fit to successfully executive the duties of the Presidency” after a routine physical exam.

But concerns over Biden’s age and cognitive fitness loomed over his reelection campaign. Calls for him to drop out of the race intensified after the first presidential debate of the 2024 election last June, and he ultimately withdrew his candidacy in July. Then-Vice President Kamala Harris later became the Democratic nominee before losing the election to President Donald Trump in November.

On Sunday, Trump posted on his social media platform Truth Social that he and First Lady Melania Trump sent their best to Biden’s family, and wished the former President “a fast and successful recovery.”

Trump, who at the age of 78 became the oldest President to start a presidential term earlier this year, has also faced scrutiny over his health. During his presidential campaign, many pushed for him to release his medical records, especially after Harris released her own after entering the race. After Trump took office a second time, the White House released the results of his cognitive test and physical examination and tests. Trump’s physician deemed him to be in “excellent health” and said he is “fully fit” to be President.


Spread the news
Categories
Full Text Articles - Audio Posts

Supreme Court Allows Trump Administration to Strip Protections from Venezuelan Migrants

Spread the news

Supreme Court - Washington, DC

The Supreme Court on Monday ruled in an emergency order that the Trump Administration can remove legal protections from thousands of Venezuelan migrants, potentially putting them at risk of deportation.

The decision will allow the Administration to reverse a decision made under former President Biden to extend Venezuelans’ eligibility for Temporary Protected Status (TPS), which grants foreign nationals work authorization, protects them from deportation, and allows them to travel.

[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]

Eligibility for the protections was set to expire for Venezuelans in October 2026, after former Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas extended the 2023 Venezuela TPS designation. But in February, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem sought to reverse that extension and make the protections expire this October instead.

A San Francisco federal judge barred the Administration from terminating TPS for Venezuelans in a March ruling. But the nation’s highest court issued a stay on Monday, allowing the Administration’s new policy to remain in place while litigation over the decision continues in the lower courts. 

More than 300,000 Venezuelans in the U.S. have TPS. The status does not offer recipients a legal pathway to citizenship.

More than a dozen countries, including Haiti and Nicaragua, are currently designated for TPS. In March, Noem also moved to cancel TPS protections for Afghanistan.

The order says that Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson would have denied the application.


Spread the news
Categories
Full Text Articles - Audio Posts

Liberty raise first WNBA Championship banner, defeat Aces in season opener at Barclays Center

Spread the news

The energy was electric on Saturday as the New York Liberty returned home to open their 2025 season in front of a massive crowd — and for the first time in franchise history, as reigning WNBA champions.

The team’s long-awaited 2024 title win — their first in 28 seasons — was immortalized in a pregame ring and banner ceremony in Barclays Center. But it was the fans who turned the opener into a full-blown celebration of basketball and borough pride.

Liberty faithful flooded into the Fort Greene arena ahead of tipoff decked in seafoam green, many sporting homemade signs, vintage merch, and replica rings. Chants of “Let’s go Liberty!” rang out from every section, but not far from the court, 18-year-old Mia Menzies was celebrating more than just the start of a new season.

new york liberty unveiling championship banner
The Liberty unveil their 2024 WNBA Championship banner before tipoff at Barclays Center on May 17, 2025. Photo courtesy of New York Liberty

“I’m celebrating my 18th birthday with the franchise that raised me,” she told Brooklyn Paper. “I’ve been coming to Liberty games since I was a little girl, and winning a championship has been everything to me. I’ve been on an all-time high since it happened.”

For fans Sloane and Ken Rhoden from Birmingham, Alabama, the Liberty home opener was worth traveling cross-country.

“We came to our first Liberty game two years ago and we were absolutely hooked,” Sloane said, adding that she and her dad were excited to see the banner and ring ceremony, and to cheer on their “hometown girl,” Liberty point guard Jaylyn Sherrod.

Before the game began, the Liberty unveiled their 2024 WNBA Championship banner — the city’s first professional basketball championship banner in more than 50 years — as their beloved mascot, Ellie the Elephant, debuted the 2024 championship ring.

jonquel jones with liberty championship ring
Liberty forward Jonquel Jones proudly displays her 2024 WNBA Championship ring during the team’s home opener at Barclays Center. Photo courtesy of New York Liberty

In addition to the Liberty’s signature torch, the championship ring, designed by Jason of Beverly Hills in collaboration with Brooklyn-based artists Dynasty and Soull Ogun, features a powerful visual: a leaf emerging from cracks in concrete.

Symbolizing growth, resilience and new beginnings, the motif pays homage to “The Concrete Jungle,” and signals that the Liberty’s first WNBA title is just the start of a larger legacy.

“In creating the 2024 WNBA Championship Ring, the New York Liberty reflect on our story on and off the court – our commitment to pursuing the dream of a WNBA Championship for 28 years and the pride we take in bringing New York this championship,” said Keia Clarke, CEO of the New York Liberty. “This ring is a tribute to every fan, every player who believed in the New York Liberty and shared in our unforgettable 2024 title run.”

Ellie the Elephant shows off her custom 2024 Championship ring during a show-stopping halftime performance at the Liberty’s home opener.

At halftime, Ellie stole the spotlight with a Nicki Minaj-inspired set and revealed her own custom replica ring.

“To be gifted and recognized with a REAL championship ring truly shows why New York is different,” Ellie said in a statement to the press. “The ring makes me feel appreciated and a part of what it means to be a champion. It’s real and it’s HEAVY, but it’s mine! Debuting it during halftime was truly surreal, and the crowd went WILD!”

The square-topped ring also opens to reveal a first-of-its-kind hidden gift: a pair of earrings designed by Jason of Beverly Hills, allowing players to carry their championship with them every day.

“This wasn’t just a ring — it was a responsibility,” said Jason Arasheben, founder & CEO of Jason of Beverly Hills. “The story of the 2024 New York Liberty is one of resilience, purpose, and transformation. This piece is as iconic as the championship it celebrates.”

 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by amNYSports (@amnysports)

On the court, the Liberty delivered, defeating the Las Vegas Aces 92-78 in a rematch of last year’s Finals.

Breanna Stewart led the team with 25 points, while new addition Natasha Cloud made an immediate impact, adding 22 of her own.

The victory — and the unveiling of both the championship banner and ring — represented the team’s evolution, said Liberty head coach Sandy Brondello.

“I think it’s the growth of our league, isn’t it?” she said of the difference between her 2014 WNBA Championship with the Phoenix Mercury and her big win last year with the Liberty. “To think of where it was back in 2014 to today, it’s just blown up and that makes me really proud.”

Looking ahead, she said, “a year from here, hopefully we’re doing it again.”


Spread the news
Categories
Full Text Articles - Audio Posts

Mozilla fixed zero-days recently demonstrated at Pwn2Own Berlin 2025

Spread the news

Mozilla addressed two critical Firefox vulnerabilities that could be potentially exploited to access sensitive data or achieve code execution.

Mozilla released security updates to fix two critical vulnerabilities in the Firefox browser that could be potentially exploited to access sensitive data or achieve code execution.

“This week at the security hacking competition pwn2own, security researchers demonstrated two new content-process exploits against Firefox. Neither of the attacks managed to break out of our sandbox, which is required to gain control over the user’s system.” reads a post published on the Mozilla Security Blog. “Out of abundance of caution, we just released new Firefox versions in response to these attacks – all within the same day of the second exploit announcement. The updated versions are Firefox 138.0.4, Firefox ESR 128.10.1, Firefox ESR 115.23.1 and Firefox for Android. Despite the limited impact of these attacks, all users and administrators are advised to update Firefox as soon as possible.”

Both vulnerabilities were demonstrated as zero-day flaws during the recent Pwn2Own Berlin 2025 hacking contest.

Below are the descriptions of the two vulnerabilities:

CVE-2025-4918 is an out-of-bounds access when resolving Ppomise objects.

“An attacker was able to perform an out-of-bounds read or write on a JavaScript Promise object.” reads the advisory.

The vulnerability was discovered by Edouard Bochin and Tao Yan from Palo Alto Networks working with Trend Micro’s Zero Day Initiative.

CVE-2025-4919 is an out-of-bounds access when optimizing linear sums.

“An attacker was able to perform an out-of-bounds read or write on a JavaScript object by confusing array index sizes.” reads the advisory.

The vulnerability was discovered by Manfred Paul working with Trend Micro’s Zero Day Initiative.

The vulnerabilities affect all versions of Firefox before 138.0.4 (including Firefox for Android), all versions of Firefox Extended Support Release (ESR) before 128.10.1, and all versions of Firefox ESR before 115.23.1.

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, Firefox)


Spread the news
Categories
Full Text Articles - Audio Posts

‘Let the Process Begin’ – Trump Says Call With Putin ‘Went Very Well’

Spread the news

The US president said Moscow and Kyiv would start working towards a ceasefire deal, and his tone suggests that more sanctions on Moscow are unlikely at present.

Spread the news
Categories
Full Text Articles - Audio Posts

Trump Calls for ‘Major Investigations’ Into Harris Campaign’s Payments to Major Celebrities

Spread the news

President Donald Trump called for “major investigations” Monday into Kamala Harris’s campaign payments to celebrities and entertainers who endorsed the Democrat’s failed presidential campaign.

Trump singled out Harris campaign payments to pop star Beyoncé Knowles, rocker Bruce Springsteen, and other entertainers in a series of posts on Truth Social. Harris’s team paid millions of dollars to those celebrities and others in hopes that star appeal would turn out voters. Harris’s campaign paid Knowles’s production company $165,000 for an appearance at a Houston campaign rally on Oct. 25 and $75,000 to Springsteen’s company for a gig in Philadelphia on Oct. 29, the Washington Free Beacon reported.

“THIS IS AN ILLEGAL ELECTION SCAM AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL! IT IS AN ILLEGAL CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION!” Trump wrote. “I am going to call for a major investigation into this matter. Candidates aren’t allowed to pay for ENDORSEMENTS, which is what Kamala did, under the guise of paying for entertainment.”

Trump did not say whether he wants the Department of Justice or Congress to investigate the payments. But any probe could shine an embarrassing light on the Harris campaign’s finances as she weighs whether to run again for president in 2028. Many Democratic donors have fumed at the Harris payments to celebrities after the campaign burned $1.5 billion in just three months. In addition to celebrity payments, Harris doled out hundreds of millions of dollars to Democratic advertising firms and consultants, only to lose decisively to Trump in November.

According to campaign finance records, Harris’s campaign paid $211,000 to the touring company of Latin singer Ricky Martin, $20,000 to the rapper Fat Joe, and $80,000 to R&B singer Victoria Monét. Most of the musicians performed at the campaign events. Springsteen gave a brief speech and a short acoustic set at a Harris event in Philadelphia on Oct. 29.

The Harris campaign has denied paying for celebrity endorsements, and said that any payments to entertainers were for “ancillary costs” for their performances. But that may not explain the exorbitant payments to entertainers who spoke at Harris events without musical performances.

Knowles, who is married to rapper Jay-Z, gave just a four-minute speech at the Houston event, saying she was “here as a mother.” Knowles did not perform any music at the event, angering many fans who expected her to perform.

And rapper Cardi B, who has bragged in the past about drugging men and stealing their money, claimed she “didn’t get paid a dollar” to appear at an event for Harris in Milwaukee on Nov. 1. “I actually came out of pocket for glam and travel because it’s somewhere I wanted to be,” Cardi B said on social media in November.

But campaign records show Harris’s campaign paid $58,000 to Cardi B’s production company, the Free Beacon reported.

Trump has criticized Harris’s campaign payments before. In January, he accused Harris of making “illegal” payments to the nonprofit group of MSNBC host Al Sharpton. The Free Beacon reported that Harris’s campaign paid $500,000 to Sharpton’s organization, the National Action Network, just days before Sharpton interviewed Harris on MSNBC.

“Totally against the law,” Trump said.

Campaign records also show Harris paid $50,000 to the entertainment company of billionaire NBA superstar Lebron James and $35,000 to actress Jennifer Garner. James posted a 90-second video on his social media accounts on Oct. 31 that touted Harris and portrayed Trump as a racist. Garner spoke at several Harris campaign events. The campaign also paid $95,000 to the company of Barack and Michelle Obama, who appeared at several events for Harris before the election.

The post Trump Calls for ‘Major Investigations’ Into Harris Campaign’s Payments to Major Celebrities appeared first on .


Spread the news
Categories
Full Text Articles - Audio Posts

Russia, Ukraine to begin ceasefire negotiations: Trump

Spread the news

(NewsNation) — After a two-hour call with Russian President Vladimir Putin, President Donald Trump said Russia and Ukraine will immediately begin ceasefire negotiations.

Trump made the announcement on Truth Social and painted a more positive picture of the call than Putin, who expressed a willingness to work toward a “possible future peace agreement.”

Trump described the tone of the call as “excellent” and said Russia wants large-scale trade with the U.S., calling it a tremendous opportunity for the country.

He said the negotiations would also include the end of the war between Russia and Ukraine.

“The conditions for that will be negotiated between the two parties, as it can only be, because they know details of a negotiation that nobody else would be aware of,” Trump said.

Previous efforts to broker a ceasefire stalled with the status of Crimea a major hurdle in coming to an agreement. At times, Trump has also suggested Ukraine make major concessions to Russia when it comes to territory.

Ending the war in Ukraine was something Trump repeatedly promised to do on the campaign trail, the president boasting that he could even end the war before he took office.

During earlier attempts to broker an agreement, Trump got into a shouting match in the Oval Office with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy over a perceived lack of gratitude for U.S. aid.

Trump also repeated Russian talking points about the war, including casting blame on Ukraine despite the country having been invaded by Russia.

As talks have gone on, the president has shown frustration over the process and the White House has suggested the U.S. may walk away from conversations if a deal isn’t reached.


Spread the news
Categories
Full Text Articles - Audio Posts

The True Meaning of an American Pope

Spread the news

On May 8, I stood on the colonnades of St. Peter’s Square on the beautiful afternoon a new Pope was elected, shoulder to shoulder with pilgrims from every corner of the globe. The roar that erupted when white smoke billowed from the Sistine Chapel chimney is something I’ll never forget.

The earth beneath my feet shook as the bells of the ancient basilica tolled. And then the announcement: the unknown Robert Francis Prevost had been elected the Vicar of Jesus Christ. The Cardinal-electors had chosen a Midwesterner to be the successor of St. Peter.

[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]

As the red velvet drapes parted on the balcony, we knew we were seeing the dawn of a new era for the Church–and, in some ways, for America too.

For the first time ever, the most famous American in the world is not the President or a Hollywood icon or tech billionaire–it’s the Pope.

This is more than a Catholic triumph; it’s a cultural watershed for the U.S. In a society that often equates American influence with might or money or celebrity, now our foremost representative on the global stage is a humble man in white robes, preaching love, justice, and mercy.

For all the lofty historical comparisons, sometimes the ordinariness of this moment is what strikes me most. After the white smoke cleared and the crowds drifted home singing hymns, I did something utterly mundane: I pulled out my phone and shot off a text to an old contact I had in my phone from a decade past. Except, that old contact is now the Pope.

I thumbed, hitting send with a mix of giddy disbelief and pride. Almost immediately, the message bubble turned green, undeliverable.

Of course it did. Father Bob had traded his iPhone for the Fisherman’s Ring, and his private cell number was probably deactivated by the Vatican within minutes of “Habemus Papam.”

I laughed at myself for thinking I could just text the Pope, but the impulse itself says so much: we Americans are used to our leaders being just a tap away, and for a moment I had forgotten that my countryman on the balcony was now a universal pastor with an entirely different life.

Still, the very fact that the new Pope had a number in my contacts list is a testament to his accessibility and American-ness.

For an American Catholic like me, that hint of shared culture is both charming and reassuring. It reminds us that the papacy isn’t an abstract institution; it’s held by a person, and now that person happens to hail from our own shores.

Pope Leo XIV’s election has instantly made the rituals of the Vatican feel a touch more familiar to Americans–and perhaps made the idea of holiness feel a touch more attainable.

Beyond the novelty and pride, many of us are looking to this new Pope with a deeper longing: Could this be a moment of moral and institutional renewal for America? It’s no secret that our country has been sorely divided in recent years. We’ve endured bruising political fights, a crisis of truth and civility, even an insurrection and the ongoing temptation of authoritarian politics. Trust in institutions is at a historic low; faith communities themselves are riven by conflict. Americans, in short, are hungry for healing–a restoration of integrity in our public life and compassion in our communities.

In this context, the first American Pope feels providential. Who better than an American, steeped in the ideals of liberty under God, to remind the world that faith and freedom stand together against loneliness and isolationism?

Don’t be surprised if he soon uses his moral pulpit to gently, but firmly, push back against the siren song of authoritarian leaders–be they on the international stage or lurking in our domestic politics. His voice, coming from an American who cannot be dismissed as “anti-American,” might uniquely rally the conscience of our people. At the very least, his example of servant leadership–prioritizing the poor, dialoguing with opponents, renouncing worldly power–is a much-needed antidote to the cynical power grabs we’ve grown accustomed to.

This is a time when America’s image is often tied to loud, combative nationalism and a cult of personality. How poetic, then, that as we turn the page, the world’s spotlight shifts to an American known for quiet service and spiritual depth. Pope Leo XIV’s rise doesn’t erase our nation’s struggles, but it does offer a new narrative for what American leadership can mean. It suggests that America’s greatest export might not be our entertainment or weaponry, but our capacity for moral vision.


Spread the news