My impression that the Kirk’s assassination is the Mossad job is based mostly on technical aspects. It is quite similar in its scenery to the Butler Farm Show. Hypothetically, the weapons in both are the specialized smart mini-drones, although different in function: superficial and light in Trump’s case, and deadly in Kirk’s. To hypothesize further, the “Kirk’s drone” might hit and fracture the hyoid bone on direct impact, which is deadly.
The common feature is to influence political perceptions and emotions.
No photos of the wound on Google Search adds to the puzzle.
Michael Novakhov (Mike Nova)
9.14. 25
Weaponized smart mini-drones targeting the neck are a credible threat due to advancements in drone autonomy and miniaturization, though specific incidents are rare and typically classified. Concerns center on the potential for these unmanned aerial systems (UAS), especially when operating in swarms, to carry small lethal payloads, deliver toxic agents, or use kinetic force against vulnerable human targets. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
This scenario is a subject of serious national security concern due to rapid advancements in the elements required to create such weapons. Key technological capabilities contributing to this threat include miniaturization, allowing for difficult-to-detect micro-drones; artificial intelligence and autonomy, enabling systems to select and engage targets without human intervention; and the potential for drone swarms to overwhelm defenses. The concept of a drone targeting the neck with kinetic force is concerning, and other potential lethal payloads could involve explosives or toxic agents. [6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
While a direct, publicly reported incident of a micro-drone targeting a person in this manner is not known, the underlying risks are well-documented. Reports have indicated that autonomous drones have engaged targets without human command, and drones have been increasingly used for targeted attacks by various actors. The accessibility of commercial drone technology and the relative ease of weaponization contribute to this risk. [4, 11, 12]
Countermeasures and defenses against the threat of weaponized drones involve a multi-layered approach, including detection, tracking, identification, and mitigation. Counter-UAS systems utilize various sensors to identify and locate drones. If a threat is confirmed, active countermeasures such as RF jamming, cyber-takeover, or kinetic solutions can be deployed to disable the drone. However, countering small, low-flying, or fully autonomous drones remains challenging due to their size, erratic movement, use of concealment, and independence from RF signals for control. [13, 14, 15, 16, 17]
AI responses may include mistakes.
[9] https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/ResearchInsight/ai-impact-analysis-military-drone-industry.asp
–
A swarm of small, autonomous “smart” drones equipped with deadly payloads is a potential threat that has been publicly discussed and investigated
. The danger is magnified by advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics, which could allow such drones to identify, track, and attack specific targets without direct human control.
Potential capabilities of such drones
The potential for small, autonomous drones to be equipped with dangerous capabilities has been discussed in public forums and research. These capabilities could include carrying various payloads and utilizing advanced technology for targeting.
Public research and related incidents
The potential for “slaughterbots,” as these weapons have been dubbed, has been documented in various public sources, highlighting concerns about the future of autonomous weapons.
Current regulations
Operating a weaponized drone is illegal in many places. There are strict regulations and high penalties for attaching dangerous weapons to drones without specific authorization. The development and use of lethal autonomous weapon systems are also subjects of significant international debate.
Acknowledging the ethical implications
Discussions around such technology raise profound ethical and safety questions. While this information is intended to inform about a potential threat, it is crucial to recognize the grave implications of developing and using such weapons.
–