

4PM ET 04/03/2025 Newscast
![]() |
Michael_Novakhov shared this story . |
Elon Musk (left) shakes hands with President Donald Trump at the finals for the NCAA wrestling championship in Philadelphia on March 22, 2025. | Matt Rourke/AP
Rachael Bade is POLITICO’s Capitol bureau chief and senior Washington columnist. She is a former co-author of POLITICO Playbook and co-author of “Unchecked: The Untold Story Behind Congress’s Botched Impeachments of Donald Trump.” Her reported column, Corridors, illuminates how power pulses through Washington, from Capitol Hill to the White House and beyond.
President Donald Trump has told his inner circle, including members of his Cabinet, that Elon Musk will be stepping back in the coming weeks from his current role as governing partner, ubiquitous cheerleader and Washington hatchet man.
The president remains pleased with Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency initiative but both men have decided in recent days that it will soon be time for Musk to return to his businesses and take on a supporting role, according to three Trump insiders who were granted anonymity to describe the evolving relationship.
Musk’s looming exit comes as some Trump administration insiders and many outside allies have become frustrated with his unpredictability and increasingly view the billionaire as a political liability, a dynamic that was thrown into stark relief Tuesday when a conservative judge Musk vocally supported lost his bid for a Wisconsin Supreme Court seat by 10 points.
It also represents a shift in the Trump-Musk relationship from a month ago, when White House officials and allies were predicting Musk was “here to stay” and that Trump would find a way to blow past the 130-day time limit.
One senior administration official said Musk is likely to retain an informal role as an adviser and continue to be an occasional face around the White House grounds. Another cautioned that anyone who thinks Musk is going to disappear entirely from Trump’s orbit is “fooling themselves.”
The transition, the insiders said, is likely to correspond to the end of Musk’s time as a “special government employee,” a special status that temporarily exempts him from some ethics and conflict-of-interest rules. That 130-day period is expected to expire in late May or early June.
Musk’s defenders inside the administration believe that the time will soon be right for a transition, given their view that there’s only so much more he can cut from government agencies without shaving too close to the bone.
But many other Trump allies say he’s an unpredictable, unmanageable force who has had issues communicating his plans with Cabinet secretaries and through the White House chain of command led by Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, frequently sending them into a frenzy with unexpected and off-message comments on X, his social-media platform — including sharing unvetted and uncoordinated plans to gut federal agencies.
That’s to say nothing of their concerns about Musk as a political liability who has served as a rallying point for fractured Democrats. In Wisconsin, Musk’s opponents seized on his millions of dollars of spending in the judicial race, with some openly calling it a referendum on the polarizing mogul.
Publicly, Trump has shown nothing but admiration for Musk, who spent millions to help elect him. He often touts the waste, fraud, and abuse DOGE claims to have identified, hailing Musk’s work as revolutionary.
But my colleague Sophia Cai reports that Trump is increasingly mindful of next year’s midterms and making sure he doesn’t jeopardize his House majority. He’s kept a careful eye on the town hall outrage over DOGE, even as Republicans have chalked those scenes up to coordinated liberal stagecraft.
Also telling, Cai notes: His discussions about next steps for Musk came just days before he grew so worried about the GOP’s narrow House margin that he withdrew New York Rep. Elise Stefanik’s nomination to be ambassador to the UN.
Trump had already started easing the glide path starting more than a week before the election — including at a March 24 Cabinet meeting where he told attendees that Musk would be transitioning out of the administration, according to one of the insiders, who did not attend the meeting but was briefed on the comments. A senior administration official confirmed Trump discussed Musk’s transition at the meeting.
Soon after, Trump invited reporters and cameras in for the tail end of the meeting, where he lavished praise on Musk, who attended the meeting wearing a red MAGA hat. Cabinet secretaries — many of whom had clashed with Musk just weeks before over Musk’s bull-in-a-china-shop approach to cutting their departments — in turn jumped in to hail his bureaucracy-slashing campaign.
“Elon, I want to thank you — I know you’ve been through a lot,” Trump said, mentioning death threats and the spate of vandalism directed at the cars built by Musk’s Tesla before calling him “a patriot” and “a friend of mine.”
Both men subsequently hinted publicly at a transition. When Fox News’ Bret Baier asked Musk on Thursday whether he’d be ready to leave when his special government employee status expires, he essentially declared mission accomplished: “I think we will have accomplished most of the work required to reduce the deficit by $1 trillion within that time frame.”
On Monday night, Trump told reporters that “at some point Elon’s gonna want to go back to his company,” adding: “He wants to. I’d keep him as long as I could keep him.”
“As the President said, this White House would love to keep Elon around for as long as possible,” White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said Tuesday as election results from Wisconsin rolled in. “Elon has been instrumental in executing the President’s agenda, and will continue this good work until the President says otherwise.”
After this story was first published Wednesday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt referred to it as “garbage” in a social media post but did not dispute the reporting. She confirmed that “Elon will depart from public service as a special government employee when his incredible work at DOGE is complete.”
But many close to Trump are relieved that Musk is expected to soon move on from his central role at Trump’s side and that the litany of DOGE surprises — which have ranged from a weekend email blast demanding federal workers list their work output to accidental cuts to Ebola prevention programs — might finally be coming to a close.
The precise reasons for the expected split are not entirely clear, even to those close to the two men. But three Trump insiders said administration officials continue to chafe at Musk’s lack of communication with senior staff and the Cabinet — an issue they’ve struggled with since January and have tried with mixed success to address with Musk himself.
To wit: Trump’s announcement at the Cabinet meeting came three days after the New York Times scooped that the Pentagon had planned to brief Musk on classified war plans regarding China — a major potential conflict of interest given Musk’s business dealings there. While the Pentagon and the White House publicly dismissed the story as fake news, the headline caught both Trump and Wiles by surprise, leaving them scrambling to find out what was happening.
Trump publicly downplayed the situation but also took the opportunity to draw new boundaries around Musk. “You wouldn’t show it to a businessman,” he told reporters about the war plans, suggesting Musk could be “susceptible” given his business interests.
“People were so pissed about it, because it’s fucking insane,” said one person close to the White House familiar with what happened.
Several longtime Trump advisers told me that the president has been smart to keep Musk around — precisely because he has acted as a lightning rod for Trump critics. Musk, they argue, has been a political heat shield for the president, proudly owning the most controversial aspects of his agenda, such as his gutting of the federal workforce), taking the arrows that would otherwise wound Trump himself.
“Let someone else scoop up the dog shit — the DOGE shit in this case,” as one longtime adviser told me.
But others said Musk can’t play that role indefinitely — especially if his antics are blowing back on the president directly.
“Elon’s taking a lot of bullets for Trump — a lot — and Trump knows that and sees that,” said another longtime Trump ally. “But if it starts to rub off on him, that’s when the honeymoon ends…. That’s starting to happen.”
The internal frustrations with Musk started well before Trump’s victory in November. In the weeks leading up to the election, some Trump allies complained to me that Musk was spending too much time hanging around Mar-a-Lago, trying to ingratiate himself with the president.
Those people were skeptical at the time that Musk would enter the administration, arguing that there was no way he would want to take a pause from his businesses to focus on the tedious work of governing. Some privately held out hope that when Trump moved back into the White House, Musk — who had essentially been living at Trump’s Florida resort — would no longer have as much access to their principal.
That didn’t happen, of course. Trump — who admires Musk’s self-made wealth and youth — ensured Musk was given open access to the West Wing and an office in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building next door to the White House.
One concerned member of Trump’s campaign’s team told me early on that the president didn’t realize that by keeping Musk so close, he was both empowering the tech mogul and potentially undercutting himself. Musk, the person warned, was unpredictable and rash — and it would only be a matter of time before things went sour.
It didn’t take long for that prediction to come true.
First, Musk single-handedly blew up Speaker Mike Johnson’s pre-Christmas spending deal with Democrats, leaving Republicans scrambling to avert a shutdown. Trump hadn’t asked him to intervene, people close to the president said; Musk did it on his own. But due to his proximity to the president, conservatives on Capitol Hill took Musk’s word as gospel.
A few weeks later, when Trump announced a $500 billion artificial intelligence venture, Musk couldn’t help but knock the competitor at the center of the deal, longtime Silicon Valley rival Sam Altman. People familiar with the matter told me at the time that White House aides were furious that Musk had undercut Trump’s announcement.
Despite those hiccups, Trump continued to defend and relish his relationship with the world’s richest man, who seemed to appear beside him more frequently than even his own vice president.
As his second term got underway, Trump made sure he had Musk’s back: When Republican lawmakers started to complain about Musk privately, insisting he show a softer touch as he laid off thousands of federal workers, Trump instead told Musk to get “more aggressive” with his DOGE cuts. When Cabinet secretaries privately fumed about the “five things” email — which Musk ordered sent out to employees without giving the secretaries a heads up — Trump once again defended him.
Problems began to fester, however, both publicly and internally.
Just as Democrats ramped up their messaging on GOP threat to entitlement programs, Musk appeared on Joe Rogan’s podcast and called Social Security “the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time” — a comment that flew in the face of Trump’s crystal-clear vows never to cut benefits. Musk also ginned up the MAGA online faithful after judges blocked his DOGE cuts, pushing for Trump to ignore the courts even as the White House was trying to rebut predictions of a constitutional crisis and vowing Trump would never ignore such an order.
Both of those episodes, I’m told, prompted senior White House officials to speak directly to Musk, who quickly got on message. But many Trump allies continue to believe Musk simply has a hard time understanding how to be a team player. He isn’t vicious or mean-spirited, they say — he’s been willing, in fact, to admit to mistakes both privately and publicly and try to correct them — but he has been hard to wrangle despite Trump, Wiles and others impressing on him the need to coordinate.
“There’s a lack of an understanding about communications and why it’s important, that you massage things, that you talk about things, that you qualify things — they just don’t do it,” said one of the aforementioned allies.
“They think he’s a genius, but he’s a one-man wrecking ball,” added one longtime top Trump adviser.
The tensions came to a head about a month ago, when Trump told secretaries during a March 6 Cabinet meeting that they were in charge of making cuts at their agencies — not Musk. When Trump went further at last week’s Cabinet meeting, confirming the impending end of Musk’s full-time White House role, some of the secretaries were relieved, according to people familiar with their thinking.
But Trump’s praise was genuine, they said. Despite their rollercoaster of a relationship, insiders insist that the president will always have a special place for Musk in his heart, if not his administration.
There’s a Big Sell-Off on Wall Street
![]() |
Michael_Novakhov shared this story from |
Rely on OC Media? We rely on you too.
Amidst the current global turmoil, small news outlets like ours could be the first to close. Help us get off grants and become the first reader-funded news site in the Caucasus, and keep telling the stories that matter.
The US State Department has made its first comment on Georgia under the new administration of US President Donald Trump, maintaining the previous administration’s critical tone towards the Georgian government.
On Wednesday, <a href=”http://www.globalnews.ge” rel=”nofollow”>www.globalnews.ge</a> published the US State Department’s written response ‘regarding the United States’ position on the current situation in Georgia’.
‘We continue to evaluate our approach to Georgia to advance American interests’, the response read.
‘The United States has made clear the steps Georgia’s government can take to demonstrate it is serious about improving its relationship with the United States. Regarding continuing anti-democratic actions taken by the Georgian Dream government — as Vice President [JD] Vance said in Munich, you cannot win a democratic mandate by censoring your opponents or putting them in jail, nor can you win one by disregarding your basic electorate on questions like who gets to be a part of our shared society’.
‘The United States has been a partner to Georgia and the Georgian people for 33 years, and a strong supporter of Georgia’s independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity throughout that time’.
The US State Department’s comments were made after a <a href=”http://www.globalnews.ge” rel=”nofollow”>www.globalnews.ge</a> journalist questioned US State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce about US–Georgia relations during a recent press briefing.
‘Have you had any communication with the ruling party in Georgia? If so, could you share what type of communication exists between you? The situation in Georgia is very difficult, the Georgian people and the international community do not recognise the election results. Peaceful protesters have been arrested as well as an independent journalist [media manager Mzia Amaghlobeli] who is currently in jail. Given these circumstances, what is your perspective on the situation in Georgia?’, the journalist asked.
While the statement has not appeared in any official statement from the State Department or on its website, IPN reported that the US Embassy in Georgia had confirmed its authenticity.
Since Trump’s election, there has been considerable speculation on what position his administration will take regarding Georgia and its current political crisis.
The crisis originated after the October 2024 parliamentary elections gave the ruling Georgian Dream party a large majority, with 54% of the vote.
It then deepened when Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze announced in late November that the government was halting Georgia’s EU bid until 2028, sparking daily mass protests during which more than 400 demonstrators have been reported to have been detained thus far.
At the time, then-US State Department spokesperson Mathew Miller stated that the US had suspended its strategic partnership with Georgia.
In December, the US sanctioned the billionaire founder and honorary chair of Georgian Dream, Bidzina Ivanishvili, for ‘undermining the democratic and Euro-Atlantic future of Georgia for the benefit of the Russian Federation’.
Georgian Dream officials were quick to criticise the decision.
Following the election, Georgian Dream officials changed tactics, making a concerted effort to court the Trump administration while often appearing to copy Trump’s rhetoric when describing domestic issues
The diplomatic freeze that began under former US President Joe Biden ended in March 2025, when the US Ambassador to Georgia Robin Dunigan met with Foreign Minister Maka Botchorishvili.
The Georgian government’s cautious rhetoric
Following the October 2024 parliamentary elections — where it secured a fourth consecutive victory, despite the results not being recognised by the local opposition and civil society — Georgian Dream repeatedly stated that it looked forward to resetting relations with the US.
The rhetoric of Georgian Dream, its satellites, and mouthpieces was built on the premise that the new US administration would begin a fight against the ‘deep state’ and the ‘global war party’ , while simultaneously improving relations between Georgia and the US.
Georgian Dream officials have routinely referenced the threat of the global war party and deep state, two nebulous terms for shadowy forces the ruling party claims have been trying to pull Georgia into war and overthrow the government.
But recently their rhetoric has changed.
Since late December, senior Georgian Dream officials have begun making cautious statements that not everything was as clear-cut regarding future Georgia–US relations.
Parliamentary majority leader Mamuka Mdinaradze claimed in December that Georgia should not place ‘too much hope’ on Trump’s second term.
‘We should neither be hopeless nor place undue hope in the period after 20 January [Trump’s inauguration day]’, he said.
Mdinaradze claimed ‘Trump’s two main promises’ suited Georgia, including his promises regarding ‘ending the war [in Ukraine]’ and ‘defeating the deep state’.
‘The positioning of our country will depend on the events after 20 January, to what extent Donald Trump will be able to fulfill his promises’, Mdinaradze said.
On Wednesday, Luka Ekhvaia, advisor to Georgian President Mikheil Kavelashvili on international relations, stated in a podcast by the Georgian Public Broadcaster that the rhetoric of Georgian Dream representatives shows that the party is willing to continue the US’s critical policy towards them.
On Thursday, Georgian Dream’s mouthpiece Zaza Shatirishvili wrote in a letter published by local pro-government media that Georgian Dream team is changing its rhetoric regarding the US. Previously, party members and their satellites said that Trump would defeat the deep state, but now they also consider the US president to be its tool.
‘The US is still the main instrument of the global war party. Accordingly, its collapse also means the collapse of the global war party. Against the background of serious problems facing the American economy and the dollar, the deep state desperately needs to strengthen the image of America. However, naturally, even under the conditions of rebranding, the wolf will not stop howling and the deep state will not stop implementing its militaristic and revolutionary plans’, he wrote.
‘In fact, Trump is just as forced to submit to the global war party and the “deep state” as Biden’.
Speaking to the media on Thursday, Georgian Dream General Secretary and Tbilisi Mayor Kakha Kaladze said that ‘we started talking about the deep state a little earlier, three years ago. Back then, no one dared to do so, and I must say, I expected that when the Trump administration came, it would thank the Georgian government for all this’.
‘Today, the situation is that Trump is fighting the deep state, and this is not something we invented. When we talked about it, we were laughed at, but when Trump became president, the whole world learned that there is a “deep state” — a shadowy force that rules the world’.
‘Today we are in a waiting mode, there is a certain vacuum’, he said.
‘Let’s wait, we support the new US administration in defeating the deep state and if this really happens, of course, the consequences will also affect Georgia’.